COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP aggressively and effectively represents businesses and individuals in complex commercial law matters. By maintaining close contact with our clients during the litigation process, we have maintained a high level of client satisfaction. Our clients range from small closely held and family owned companies to high profile international conglomerates. We represent clients in a wide array of business disputes including employment discrimination, wrongful termination, restrictive covenant, unfair competition, employee benefits, white collar criminal defense, land use, eminent domain, constitutional issues, government defense contracts, debtor and creditor disputes, service contracts, RICO actions, corporate fraud, breach of fudiciary duty, securities law, class actions, UCC, insurance coverage matters, probate disputes, tax assessment law, construction law and business torts. Through the course of representing our clients, we have developed a diverse practice and have earned a reputation of excellence.
Contact:
Anthony P. DeMichele
(610) 834-6235 (610) 834-1749 Fax
Click to Email
O'Brien & Ryan News
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Committee Proposes Amendments to New Jersey Rules
The Civil Practice Rules Committee has made several recommendations for rule changes in New Jersey, which, if enacted, will affect the way lawsuits are handled in the state. Two proposed amendments in particular affect pleadings. The first proposal would benefit...
PA District Court: DPW Not Entitled to Full Amount of Lien Against Settlement Between Plaintiff and Philadelphia Housing Authority
In a memorandum opinion, the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that the PA Department of Public Welfare ("DPW") was not entitled to the full amount of its lien against the settlement between a plaintiff and the Philadelphia Housing...
Superior Court Permits Contractor to Recover Post-Judgment Interest, Penalties, Attorney’s Fees and Expenses Under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act
In Zimmerman v. Harrisburg Fudd I, L.P., 2009 Pa.Super. 202 (2009), the Pennsylvania Superior Court, in interpreting the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (CASPA), permitted plaintiff (contractor) to recover post-judgment interest, penalties, attorney's...
Superior Court of New Jersey Affirms Decision Refusing to Allocate Proceeds Following Settlement after Non-Binding Arbitration Award
In a per curiam opinion, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, affirmed the Law Division decision refusing to allocate proceeds following a settlement after a decision from a non-binding arbitration award which specifically allocated funds for medical...
Court Rejects Oral Modification to Written Agreement of Sale
In The Herrick Group & Associates, LLC v. K.J.T., L.P., Civil Action No. 07-CV-00628, U.S. Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice held that defendant (seller) did not prove the existence of an oral agreement to modify a written agreement of sale with plaintiff...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Join Our Newsletter
Join our quarterly newsletter list for legal updates and firm news. Just enter your email below.