MEDICAL DEVICE, MASS TORT AND PHARMACEUTICAL LITIGATION

 

For virtually a decade, O’Brien & Ryan, LLP served as liaison counsel between Pennsylvania plastic and reconstructive surgeons in the national silicone breast implant litigation and the courts. We were one of the most active firms in the Pennsylvania consolidated breast implant litigation, working for the defense of plastic surgeons involved in those mass tort lawsuits. We represented healthcare provider defendants in over two hundred cases. Of those cases, we successfully tried to verdict two breast implant cases, including the first in the state.

Additionally, attorneys of the firm have served as counsel for physicians in the pedicle screw litigation and pharmaceutical litigation cases including Fen-Phen, Rezulin, Baycol, Celexa and Vioxx. In these capacities, we have accumulated experience not only in medical device and pharmaceutical litigation, but in the particulars of mass tort litigation. Our firm has worked with the courts to develop systems for becoming proficient in case management and discovery including obtaining, organizing and utilizing massive numbers of manufacturer documents and manufacturer employee depositions produced through the course of consolidated and multi-district litigation, in both hard copy and electronic form.

Contact:
Marshall L. Schwartz
(610) 834-6294   
(610) 834-1749 Fax
Click to Email

O'Brien & Ryan News

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

New Jersey Grants Immunity to Providers Treating COVID-19 Patients

On April 13, 2020, The New Jersey legislature passed Senate Bill 2333 providing civil and criminal immunity to healthcare providers who are treating patients for COVID-19. This bill was signed into law by Governor Phil Murphy on April 14, 2020, and provides immunity...

Settling Defendants Required to Appear on Jury Verdict Sheet

In Dunlap v. Ridley Park Swim Club, et al.,1 the PA Superior Court reversed and remanded the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County because the trial court did not include the settling defendant on the verdict sheet. ...

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Join Our Newsletter

Join our quarterly newsletter list for legal updates and firm news. Just enter your email below.