Nursing Home & Long-Term Care Litigation
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP represents nursing homes, assisted living facilities and other long-term care facilities throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Our long-term care practice group consists of attorneys who dedicate their practices to the representation to these facilities. O’Brien & Ryan, LLP utilizes well respected experts in nursing, geriatric medicine and facility administration in the defense of our clients. We are also very familiar with federal and state regulation of nursing homes in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and the impact of regulations on nursing home litigation. O’Brien & Ryan, LLP has successfully defended long-term care facilities in cases involving medication errors, various types of pressure ulcers, falls, abuse, infections, and many other areas. The firm has also successfully defended our clients against corporate negligence claims and cases involving violations of federal and state regulations and employment matters.
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP has counseled clients on alternative dispute resolution and risk management strategies. The firm has also represented long-term care facilities in regulatory and administrative matters and white-collar criminal investigations. Our attorneys are experienced in representing individuals employed by long-term care facilities including medical directors, administrators, nurses and therapists. O’Brien & Ryan attorneys have lectured nationally on long-term care issues including malpractice prevention and risk management and defending long-term care facilities in litigation. It is our goal to provide the best possible defense to our institutional clients in a cost-effective and professional manner.
Contact:
Marshall L. Schwartz
(610) 834-6294 (610) 834-1749 Fax
Click to Email
O'Brien & Ryan News
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Attorney-Expert Witness Contact Permitted During Break in Trial
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a criminal contempt order issued by a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas trial judge and ruled that an attorney is permitted to speak with his expert witness during a break from direct examination. Yoskowitz v. Yazdanfar,...
Employer Can Request That Employee Undergo Medical Examination
The issue of when and under what circumstances an employer can request that an employee undergo a medical examination under the Americans with Disabilities Act was recently decided in the case of Ward v. Merck & Co., 17 Am. Disabilities Cas (BNA) (E.D....
Treating Physician’s Opinion Admissible in Workers’ Compensation Hearings
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled that an Administrative Law Judge misapplied the "treating physician rule" when he concluded that a doctor's objectivity was undermined because he was an advocate for the claimant in his workers'...
Subcontractor Prohibited From Filing Mechanics’ Lien
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania dismissed a subcontractor's mechanics' lien for failure to issue the requisite notice under Pennsylvania law. Wentzel-Applewood Joint Ventures v. 801 Market Street Associates, 878 A. 2d 889 (Pa. Super. 2005). As a result of...
Non-Owned, Regularly-Used Car Exclusion Allowed in Insurance Contracts
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that automobile insurance carriers are permitted to maintain a clause in their policies that states that the carrier has no obligation to insure a policy-holder who is driving a car that he does not own, but uses on a regular...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Join Our Newsletter
Join our quarterly newsletter list for legal updates and firm news. Just enter your email below.